EB-1A Sustained โ Environmental Engineering (2018): the AAO concluded that the petitioner demonstrated
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO concluded that the petitioner demonstrated eligibility in the final merits determination. While the Service Center Director agreed the petitioner met three initial criteria, they denied the case on final merits. The AAO found that the petitioner's 11 patents utilized by companies, her consistent peer-review work for highly-rated journals, and numerous published articles, when viewed in totality, established that she has sustained acclaim and risen to the very top of her field.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See what made this petition succeed.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO sustained here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.