sustained EB-1A Case: Equestrian Show Jumping
Avoid this EB-1A denial in your own petition.
No credit card. Generate your first draft in minutes.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO found that the petitioner met the required three criteria. Although the director found only one criterion was met, the AAO considered the totality of the evidence, including the petitioner's past acclaim as a rider and his more recent success as a trainer, to establish an overall pattern of sustained acclaim and extraordinary ability in the field.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.