sustained EB-1A Case: Fashion Modeling And Acting
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO considered the petitioner's work as both a fashion model and an actress. The director had incorrectly separated the two fields. The AAO found the petitioner met three criteria: published materials about her work, commanding a significantly high salary as a model (28 times higher than the level two wage), and evidence of commercial success in the performing arts based on a film role that grossed $115 million internationally.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.