Sustained
EB-1A
EB-1A Sustained — Law (2001): the AAO found the petitioner met at least three regulatory
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO found the petitioner met at least three regulatory criteria, reversing the initial denial. The petitioner successfully provided evidence of his role as Editor-in-Chief of a major law journal (judging others), letters from prominent experts attesting to his original contributions of major significance such as drafting major Korean laws, and his record of authoring numerous scholarly articles.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Judging The Work Of Others Original Contributions Of Major Significance Authorship Of Scholarly Articles
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See what made this petition succeed.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO sustained here — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.