sustained
EB-1A
sustained EB-1A Case: Life And Environmental Science
Avoid this EB-1A denial in your own petition.
No credit card. Generate your first draft in minutes.
Decision Summary
The director initially denied the petition, finding the petitioner only met one of the required three regulatory criteria. The AAO sustained the appeal because it found the petitioner had submitted sufficient evidence to meet two additional criteria: judging the work of others and making original contributions of major significance to the field, thus satisfying the minimum requirements for the classification.
Criteria Discussed
Published Material About The Alien Judging The Work Of Others Scholarly Articles Original Contributions Of Major Significance
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.