sustained EB-1A Case: Materials Chemistry
Avoid this EB-1A denial in your own petition.
No credit card. Generate your first draft in minutes.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO determined that the petitioner met the necessary evidentiary criteria, contrary to the Director's findings. The AAO found that the petitioner provided sufficient evidence of her original scientific contributions of major significance, supported by numerous expert letters detailing the impact of her research on carbon sequestration and battery materials. The AAO also affirmed that the petitioner met the criterion for judging the work of others.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.