sustained
EB-1A
sustained EB-1A Case: Mathematics
Avoid this EB-1A denial in your own petition.
No credit card. Generate your first draft in minutes.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO found that the petitioner, a mathematician, met at least three of the required regulatory criteria. Evidence showed he served as a peer reviewer for multiple academic journals, made original contributions of major significance to his field (such as the creation of Qp spaces) confirmed by expert letters and a high citation rate, and authored numerous scholarly articles in respected publications.
Criteria Discussed
Judging The Work Of Others Original Scientific Or Scholarly Contributions Of Major Significance Authorship Of Scholarly Articles
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.