EB-1A Sustained โ Mechanical Engineering (2009): the AAO found that the petitioner successfully demonstrated
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO found that the petitioner successfully demonstrated that he meets at least three of the regulatory criteria for an alien of extraordinary ability. The decision highlights that the petitioner provided sufficient evidence for his participation as a judge of the work of others through his manuscript reviews for multiple journals and conferences. It also found that letters of support established the petitioner's original scientific contributions of major significance to his field.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See what made this petition succeed.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO sustained here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.