sustained EB-1A Case: Mechanical Engineering
Avoid this EB-1A denial in your own petition.
No credit card. Generate your first draft in minutes.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO found that the petitioner successfully demonstrated that he meets at least three of the regulatory criteria for an alien of extraordinary ability. The decision highlights that the petitioner provided sufficient evidence for his participation as a judge of the work of others through his manuscript reviews for multiple journals and conferences. It also found that letters of support established the petitioner's original scientific contributions of major significance to his field.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.