EB-1A Sustained โ Medical Science (2021): the AAO found that the petitioner successfully demonstrated
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO found that the petitioner successfully demonstrated he met the criterion for original scientific contributions of major significance, which the Director had initially denied. The AAO gave significant weight to expert testimony and high citation counts, concluding that the petitioner's research had a major impact on his field. This finding allowed the petitioner to meet at least three criteria, leading to a favorable final merits determination.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See what made this petition succeed.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO sustained here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.