sustained EB-1A Case: Mobile Search Technology
Avoid this EB-1A denial in your own petition.
No credit card. Generate your first draft in minutes.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO found the petitioner satisfied three of the required evidentiary criteria. The petitioner demonstrated a leading and critical role as the founder and CEO of a reputable company, provided evidence of published material about his work in major media, and showed original contributions of major significance through patent-pending inventions in mobile search technology. This evidence was sufficient to establish that the petitioner has sustained national acclaim and is at the top of his field.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.