EB-1A Sustained โ Mobile Search Technology (2015): the AAO found the petitioner satisfied three of the
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO found the petitioner satisfied three of the required evidentiary criteria. The petitioner demonstrated a leading and critical role as the founder and CEO of a reputable company, provided evidence of published material about his work in major media, and showed original contributions of major significance through patent-pending inventions in mobile search technology. This evidence was sufficient to establish that the petitioner has sustained national acclaim and is at the top of his field.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See what made this petition succeed.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO sustained here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.