sustained EB-1A Case: Motor Sports
Avoid this EB-1A denial in your own petition.
No credit card. Generate your first draft in minutes.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO found that the petitioner's evidence met three of the ten regulatory criteria: published material about the alien, performing in a leading or critical role, and commanding a high salary. Upon conducting a final merits determination, the AAO concluded that the evidence demonstrated the beneficiary has sustained national or international acclaim and is one of the small percentage who have risen to the very top of the field.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.