Sustained
EB-1A
EB-1A Sustained — Nanomaterials Science And Nanotechnology: the AAO found that the petitioner's evidence met at least
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO found that the petitioner's evidence met at least three of the regulatory criteria for extraordinary ability. The AAO agreed that the petitioner satisfied the criterion for judging the work of others and provided detailed evidence from support letters establishing the petitioner's original scientific contributions of major significance to his field.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Major Internationally Recognized Award Judging The Work Of Others Original Contributions Of Major Significance
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See what made this petition succeed.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO sustained here — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.