sustained
EB-1A
sustained EB-1A Case: Nanomaterials Science And Nanotechnology
Avoid this EB-1A denial in your own petition.
No credit card. Generate your first draft in minutes.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO found that the petitioner's evidence met at least three of the regulatory criteria for extraordinary ability. The AAO agreed that the petitioner satisfied the criterion for judging the work of others and provided detailed evidence from support letters establishing the petitioner's original scientific contributions of major significance to his field.
Criteria Discussed
Major Internationally Recognized Award Judging The Work Of Others Original Contributions Of Major Significance
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.