Sustained
EB-1A
EB-1A Sustained — Neurological Diseases (2017): the AAO found the petitioner met a third criterion,
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO found the petitioner met a third criterion, original contributions of major significance, in addition to the two criteria previously acknowledged by the Director. The AAO concluded that the petitioner's extensive publication record, high citation counts, and role as a peer reviewer for journals collectively demonstrated sustained national and international acclaim, placing her at the very top of her field.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Judging The Work Of Others Authorship Of Scholarly Articles Original Contributions Of Major Significance Receipt Of A Major, Internationally Recognized Award
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See what made this petition succeed.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO sustained here — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.