sustained EB-1A Case: Painter
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO found that the director erroneously dismissed the petitioner's achievements as inherent to the field without considering their level. The petitioner submitted extensive evidence, including serving as a judge for national competitions, showcasing art in major exhibitions, receiving a national art award, and serving as president of a non-governmental arts organization, which collectively established sustained national acclaim.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.