sustained
EB-1A
sustained EB-1A Case: Physiology
Avoid this EB-1A denial in your own petition.
No credit card. Generate your first draft in minutes.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO found the petitioner met the minimum three evidentiary criteria required. While the Director only found the petitioner met the authorship criterion, the AAO determined on de novo review that the petitioner also satisfied the criteria for original contributions of major significance and for judging the work of others, thus meriting approval after a final merits determination.
Criteria Discussed
Authorship Of Scholarly Articles Original Scientific Contributions Of Major Significance Judging The Work Of Others
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.