Sustained
EB-1A
EB-1A Sustained — Physiology (2022): the AAO found the petitioner met the minimum three
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO found the petitioner met the minimum three evidentiary criteria required. While the Director only found the petitioner met the authorship criterion, the AAO determined on de novo review that the petitioner also satisfied the criteria for original contributions of major significance and for judging the work of others, thus meriting approval after a final merits determination.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Authorship Of Scholarly Articles Original Scientific Contributions Of Major Significance Judging The Work Of Others
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See what made this petition succeed.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO sustained here — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.