EB-1A Sustained โ Professional Wrestling (2013): the AAO found that the petitioner did meet the criterion
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO found that the petitioner did meet the criterion for 'lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards,' which the Director had failed to consider in the initial decision. Having established that the petitioner met three regulatory criteria, the AAO conducted a final merits determination and concluded that the petitioner had demonstrated the sustained acclaim and high level of expertise required for the classification.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See what made this petition succeed.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO sustained here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.