EB-1A Sustained โ Project Design (2014): the AAO found that the petitioner's evidence met three of
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO found that the petitioner's evidence met three of the regulatory criteria (published material, display of work, and leading/critical role), thus establishing basic eligibility. In the final merits determination, the AAO concluded that the petitioner's extensive 40-year international career, leading roles on major projects, and documentation of his work were sufficient to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim at the top of his field.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See what made this petition succeed.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO sustained here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.