sustained EB-1A Case: Project Design
Avoid this EB-1A denial in your own petition.
No credit card. Generate your first draft in minutes.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO found that the petitioner's evidence met three of the regulatory criteria (published material, display of work, and leading/critical role), thus establishing basic eligibility. In the final merits determination, the AAO concluded that the petitioner's extensive 40-year international career, leading roles on major projects, and documentation of his work were sufficient to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim at the top of his field.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.