sustained EB-1A Case: Radiology And Radiological Science
Avoid this EB-1A denial in your own petition.
No credit card. Generate your first draft in minutes.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO found the petitioner met the criterion for original contributions of major significance, in addition to the two criteria (judging and scholarly articles) previously acknowledged by the Director. Having met the minimum of three criteria, the AAO conducted a final merits determination and concluded that the petitioner's innovative research in cancer imaging, which had been recognized by experts and featured in publications, demonstrated sustained national acclaim.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.