Sustained
EB-1A
EB-1A Sustained — Science (2010): the AAO determined the petitioner met the necessary
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO determined the petitioner met the necessary criteria for the classification. The director had initially found the petitioner met only two criteria, but the AAO concurred on the 'judging' criterion and also found that evidence of well-cited articles and letters from experts established 'original scientific contributions of major significance'.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Judging The Work Of Others Authorship Of Scholarly Articles Original Scientific Contributions Of Major Significance
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See what made this petition succeed.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO sustained here — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.