sustained
EB-1A
sustained EB-1A Case: Shoe Design
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO found that the petitioner met three of the regulatory criteria: published material, a leading or critical role, and display of work at artistic showcases. Upon a final merits determination, the AAO concluded that the petitioner's work revitalizing major shoe brands, coupled with expert testimony, demonstrated sustained national acclaim and placed her at the very top of her field.
Criteria Discussed
Published Material About The Alien Leading Or Critical Role For Organizations With A Distinguished Reputation Display Of The Alien'S Work At Artistic Exhibitions Or Showcases
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.