Sustained
EB-1A
EB-1A Sustained — Shoe Design (2016): the AAO found that the petitioner met three of the
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO found that the petitioner met three of the regulatory criteria: published material, a leading or critical role, and display of work at artistic showcases. Upon a final merits determination, the AAO concluded that the petitioner's work revitalizing major shoe brands, coupled with expert testimony, demonstrated sustained national acclaim and placed her at the very top of her field.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Published Material About The Alien Leading Or Critical Role For Organizations With A Distinguished Reputation Display Of The Alien'S Work At Artistic Exhibitions Or Showcases
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See what made this petition succeed.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO sustained here — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.