sustained
EB-1A
sustained EB-1A Case: Stem Cell Biology And Neuroscience
Avoid this EB-1A denial in your own petition.
No credit card. Generate your first draft in minutes.
Decision Summary
The Director initially denied the petition on the final merits determination, despite finding the petitioner met three evidentiary criteria. The appeal was sustained because the AAO, upon reviewing the totality of the evidence, found that the significance of the petitioner's discoveries in spinal cord injury, her publications, citations, and strong reference letters did demonstrate that she had risen to the very top of her field.
Criteria Discussed
Judging The Work Of Others Original Contributions Of Major Significance Authorship Of Scholarly Articles
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.