sustained EB-1A Case: Table Tennis
Avoid this EB-1A denial in your own petition.
No credit card. Generate your first draft in minutes.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO found the petitioner met three regulatory criteria. He provided evidence of winning nationally and internationally recognized awards, membership in a selective national team that requires outstanding achievements, and published material about his work in major media. The AAO concluded that this evidence, along with his high national ranking, demonstrated he has sustained national or international acclaim and has risen to the very top of his field.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.