EB-1A Sustained โ Table Tennis (2015): the AAO found the petitioner met three regulatory criteria
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO found the petitioner met three regulatory criteria. He provided evidence of winning nationally and internationally recognized awards, membership in a selective national team that requires outstanding achievements, and published material about his work in major media. The AAO concluded that this evidence, along with his high national ranking, demonstrated he has sustained national or international acclaim and has risen to the very top of his field.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See what made this petition succeed.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO sustained here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.