Sustained
EB-1A
EB-1A Sustained — Technology (2023): the AAO found the petitioner satisfied three evidentiary
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO found the petitioner satisfied three evidentiary criteria: published material about his work, original contributions of major significance, and performing a leading or critical role. In the final merits determination, the AAO concluded that the petitioner's innovative work in AI and self-driving vehicles, significant venture capital investments in his companies, and recognition from experts demonstrated he is one of the small percentage at the top of his field with sustained national acclaim.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Published Material About The Petitioner Original Contributions Of Major Significance Leading Or Critical Role
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See what made this petition succeed.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO sustained here — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.