sustained EB-1A Case: Television Advertising
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO found the petitioner met the minimum evidentiary requirements for an alien of extraordinary ability. The petitioner successfully submitted evidence satisfying at least three regulatory criteria: receipt of awards, display of work at showcases, and performance in a leading/critical role. After reviewing the evidence in a final merits determination, the AAO concluded the petitioner demonstrated the sustained national or international acclaim required for the classification.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.