EB-1A Sustained โ Television Advertising (2012): the AAO found the petitioner met the minimum evidentiary
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO found the petitioner met the minimum evidentiary requirements for an alien of extraordinary ability. The petitioner successfully submitted evidence satisfying at least three regulatory criteria: receipt of awards, display of work at showcases, and performance in a leading/critical role. After reviewing the evidence in a final merits determination, the AAO concluded the petitioner demonstrated the sustained national or international acclaim required for the classification.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See what made this petition succeed.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO sustained here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.