sustained
EB-1A
sustained EB-1A Case: Theoretical Physics
Avoid this EB-1A denial in your own petition.
No credit card. Generate your first draft in minutes.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO found the petitioner met the regulatory criteria. The evidence showed he judged the work of others by reviewing numerous research papers for prominent journals and a proposal for the Army Research Office. Additionally, multiple expert letters confirmed the petitioner's seminal and original scientific contributions of major significance to the fields of quantum optics and quantum information science.
Criteria Discussed
Judging The Work Of Others Original Scientific Contributions Of Major Significance
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.