sustained EB-1A Case: Track And Field Athlete
Avoid this EB-1A denial in your own petition.
No credit card. Generate your first draft in minutes.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO disagreed with the Director's assessment and found the petitioner met the 'membership in associations' criterion based on his participation in his country's Olympic teams. Having met at least three criteria, the AAO's final merits determination concluded that the petitioner's consistent high-level achievements, including Olympic participation, international medals, and national records, demonstrated sustained acclaim and placed him at the top of his field.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.