sustained
EB-1A
sustained EB-1A Case: Transmission Engineering
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO determined the petitioner had provided sufficient objective evidence to support his claims of making contributions of major significance. This evidence included national awards from the Chinese government for commercially successful products he developed, extensive market adoption of his technology, and his documented role as a major author of national industry standards, which overcame the director's initial findings.
Criteria Discussed
Original Scientific, Scholarly, Artistic, Athletic, Or Business-Related Contributions Of Major Significance In The Field
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.