sustained EB-1A Case: Video Game Development
Avoid this EB-1A denial in your own petition.
No credit card. Generate your first draft in minutes.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO determined that the petitioner had satisfied at least three evidentiary criteria, including performing in a leading or critical role and judging the work of others. In the final merits determination, the AAO found that the beneficiary's essential work on award-winning, critically acclaimed, and commercially successful video games, coupled with his indispensable roles at well-known companies, demonstrated that he had risen to the very top of his field with sustained national acclaim.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.