EB-1A Sustained โ Video Game Development (2014): the AAO determined that the petitioner had satisfied at
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO determined that the petitioner had satisfied at least three evidentiary criteria, including performing in a leading or critical role and judging the work of others. In the final merits determination, the AAO found that the beneficiary's essential work on award-winning, critically acclaimed, and commercially successful video games, coupled with his indispensable roles at well-known companies, demonstrated that he had risen to the very top of his field with sustained national acclaim.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See what made this petition succeed.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO sustained here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.