EB-1A Sustained โ Woodworking (2015): the AAO found that the petitioner submitted sufficient
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO found that the petitioner submitted sufficient evidence to establish that the company's awards were primarily attributable to the beneficiary's work as a master craftsman. The initial denial stated the awards were given to the petitioner company, not the beneficiary, but on appeal, published material and company statements linked the beneficiary directly to the award-winning work, leading the AAO to withdraw the director's determination.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See what made this petition succeed.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO sustained here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.