dismissed EB-1C Case: Automotive

U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
In Re: 13656141 
Appeal of Nebraska Service Center Decision 
Non-Precedent Decision of the 
Administrative Appeals Office 
Date : DEC . 28, 2020 
Form 1-140, Petition for Multinational Managers or Executives 
The Petitioner , an automobile import /export and repair company , seeks to permanently employ the 
Beneficiary as its president under the first preference immigrant classification for multinational 
executives or managers . See Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 203(b )(l)(C), 8 U.S.C. 
§ l l 53(b )(1 )(C). 
The Director of the Nebraska Service Center denied the petition, concluding that the record did not 
establish that: ( 1) the Beneficiary will be employed in a managerial or executive capacity in the United 
States; (2) the Beneficiary had been employed abroad in a managerial or executive capacity; and (3) 
the Petitioner has the ability to pay the Beneficiary 's proffered wage . The matter is now before us on 
appeal. 
In these proceeding s, it is the Petitioner's burden to establish eligibility for the requested benefit. 
Section 291 of the Act, 8 U.S .C. § 1361. Upon de novo review, we will summarily dismiss the appeal. 
On the Form I-290B , Notice of Appeal or Motion , the Petitioner marked Box l .b. in Part 2, indicating 
that it would submit a brief and/or additional evidence to this office within 30 calendar days of filing 
the appeal. The Petitioner also provided a statement in Part 7 of the Form I-290B , asserting that the 
Director's conclusions constituted gross error. The record shows that the Petitioner did not supplement 
the record with an appeal brief further addressing the Director's grounds for denying the petition. 
The regulation at 8 C.F.R. § 103.3(a)(l)(v) states , in pertinent part: 
An officer to whom an appeal is taken shall summarily dismiss any appeal when the 
party concerned fails to identify specifically any erroneous conclu sion of law or 
statement of fact for the appeal. 
Despite disputing the Director's conclusions, the Petitioner only submits generic statements on appeal 
that do not specifically address why the Director's conclusions were in error. The Petitioner has not 
provided a brief, evidence , or other statements that clearly addres s errors on the part of the Director . 
Therefore, consistent with 8 C.F.R . § 103.3(a)(l)(v) , we will summarily dismiss the appeal. 
In these proceedings, it is the Petitioner's burden to establish eligibility for the requested benefit. 
Section 291 of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1361. Here, that burden has not been met. 
ORDER: The appeal is summarily dismissed pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 103.3(a)(l)(v). 
2