dismissed EB-1C

dismissed EB-1C Case: Broadcasting

๐Ÿ“… Date unknown ๐Ÿ‘ค Company ๐Ÿ“‚ Broadcasting

Decision Summary

The appeal was summarily dismissed for procedural reasons. The petitioner stated they would submit a brief or additional evidence within 30 days but failed to do so, thus not identifying any specific erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the original decision.

Criteria Discussed

Failure To Identify Erroneous Conclusion Of Law Or Fact

Sign up free to download the original PDF

View Full Decision Text
MATTER OF A-C- LTD 
APPEAL OF TEXAS SERVICE CENTER DECISION 
Non-Precedent Decision of the 
Administrative Appeals Office 
DATE: OCT.l7,2017 
PETITION: FORM I-140, IMMIGRANT PETITION FOR ALIEN WORKER 
The Petitioner, a radio and television station, seeks to permanently employ the Beneficiary as its 
Vice President under the first preference immigrant classification for multinational executives or 
managers. See Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 203(b)(l)(C), 8 U.S.C. 
ยง 1153(b )(I )(C). The Director of the Texas Service Center denied the petition. The matter is now 
before us on appeal. Upon review, we will summarily dismiss the appeal. 
An officer to whom an appeal is taken shall summarily dismiss any appeal when the party concerned 
fails to identify specifically any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact for the appeal. 
8 C.F.R. ยง 103.3(a)(l)(v). 
On appeal, the Petitioner did not provide a statement in support of the appeal that specifically 
identities an erroneous conclusion of law or fact in the decision. On the Form I-290B, Notice of 
Appeal or Motion, the Petitioner stated that a brief or additional evidence would be submitted within 
30 days of filing. However, we have not received anything further from the Petitioner to date. 
Because the Petitioner has not identified any specific, erroneous conclusion of law or statement of 
fact in the Director's decision below, the appeal must be summarily dismissed. 
ORDER: The appeal is summarily dismissed pursuant to 8 C.F.R. ยง 103.3(a)(l)(v). 
Cite as Matter of A-C- LTD, ID# 576366 (AAO Oct. 17, 2017) 
Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial

MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.

Avoid This in My Petition →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.