dismissed EB-1C Case: Business Management

. " .. -
Idet1l'tfying data deletecS to 
prevent dearly un~te4 
invasion of personal p~ 
pUBLIC COP"" 
Dat~~s \ ~ 1\\\1. Office: TEXAS SERVICE CENTER 
IN RE: Petitioner: 
Beneficiary: 
FILE: 
U.S. Department of Homeland Security 
U. S. Citizenship and Immigration Services 
Office of Administrative Appeals MS 2090 
Washington, DC 20529-2090 
U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
PETITION: Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker as a Multinational Executive or Manager Pursuant to 
Section 203(b)(1)(C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.c. § 1153(b)(1)(C) 
ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: 
INSTRUCTIONS: 
This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All documents have been returned to 
the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that office. 
If you believe the law was inappropriately applied or you have additional information that you wish to have 
considered, you may file a motion to reconsider or a motion to reopen. Please refer to 8 C.F.R. § 103.5 for 
the specific requirements. All motions must be submitted to the office that originally decided your case by 
filing a Form 1-290B, Notice of Appeal or Motion, with a fee of $585. Any motion must be filed within 30 
days of the decision that the motion seeks to reconsider, as required by 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(1)(i). 
/'~~------/h 
. "-"t---
)" Perry Rhew / 
r () Chief, Administrative Appeals Office 
www.uscis.gov 
\ .. -
DISCUSSION: The preference visa petition was denied on June 5, 2007 by the Director, Texas 
Service Center. 1 The petitioner subsequently appeal this matter to the Administrative Appeals 
Office (AAO). The AAO will neither affirm nor overturn the director's decision. Rather, the appeal 
will be dismissed as moot. 
At the time of filing the Form 1-140, the petitioner sought to hire the beneficiary as its president. 
Accordingly, the petitioner endeavors to classify the beneficiary as an employment-based immigrant 
pursuant to section 203(b)(1)(C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.c. 
§ 1153(b )(1 )(C), as a multinational executive or manager. The director denied the petition based on 
the finding that the petitioner failed to establish that the beneficiary would be employed in the 
United States in a qualifying managerial or executive capacity. 
A review of the records of the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services indicates that this beneficiary 
was granted permanent resident alien status on October 23, 2009. While the petitioner has not 
withdrawn the appeal in this proceeding, it would appear that the beneficiary is presently a permanent 
resident and the issues in this proceeding are moot. Therefore, this appeal is dismissed. 
ORDER: The appeal is dismissed as moot. 
1 The record indicates that two different petitions were filed by two different petitioners on behalf of the beneficiary. 
The subject of the instant proceeding is the 1-140 petition with receipt No. SRC0627953757.