dismissed EB-1C

dismissed EB-1C Case: Business Management

๐Ÿ“… Date unknown ๐Ÿ‘ค Company ๐Ÿ“‚ Business Management

Decision Summary

The appeal was dismissed as moot. The AAO found that the beneficiary had already adjusted to permanent resident status through a different approved immigrant petition filed by the same employer. Since the beneficiary had already obtained the immigration benefit sought, the issues in this specific appeal were no longer relevant.

Criteria Discussed

Qualifying As Executive Or Manager

Sign up free to download the original PDF

View Full Decision Text
U.S. Department of Homeland Security 
identifying data deleted to 
20 Mass, R~. ~3042 
Washington, DC 20529 
prevent clearly unwarranted 
invasion of personal ~fivacy 
 U. S. Ci tizenship 
and Immigration Services 
Pm~~c copy 
FILE: SRC 03 047 52379 OFFICE: TEXAS SERVICE CENTER Date: NOV 9 
PETITION: 
 Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker as a Multinational Executive or Manager Pursuant to 
Section 203(b)(l)(C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 8 1 153(b)(l)(C) 
ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: 
INSTRUCTIONS: 
This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All documents have been returned to 
the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that office. 
dministrative Appeals Office 
SRC 03 047 52379 
Page 2 
DISCUSSION: The preference visa petition was denied by the Director, Texas Service Center. The matter 
is now before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) on appeal. The appeal will be dismissed. 
The petitioner filed this immigrant petition seeking to employ the beneficiary as its president. Specifically, 
the petitioner endeavors to classify the beneficiary as an employment-based multinational executive or 
manager pursuant to section 203(b)(l)(C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. 
ยง 1153(b)(l)(C). 
On appeal, the petitioner asserts that the beneficiary qualifies as an executive or manager under the statutory 
definition contained at sections 101 (a)(44)(A) and (B) of the Act. 
A review of CIS records indicates that this beneficiary is also the beneficiary of an approved immigrant 
petition, filed by the same employer, and has adjusted status to that of a permanent resident status as of June 
30, 2005. While the petitioner has not withdrawn the appeal in this proceeding, it would appear that the 
beneficiary is presently a permanent resident and the issues in this proceeding are moot. Therefore, this 
appeal is dismissed. 
ORDER: 
 The appeal is dismissed as moot. 
Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial

MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.

Avoid This in My Petition →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.