EB-1C Dismissed — Carpet Services (2007): the appeal was ultimately dismissed because the petitioner

Decision Summary

The appeal was ultimately dismissed because the petitioner failed to demonstrate that the beneficiary would be employed in a primarily managerial or executive capacity. The AAO found the job descriptions vague and noted that many responsibilities suggested the performance of non-qualifying, operational tasks. The AAO also found that the petitioner's staffing was insufficient to relieve the beneficiary from performing the day-to-day services of the business.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF