Dismissed
EB-1C
EB-1C Dismissed — Construction (2006): the appeal was rejected as improperly filed because the
Decision Summary
The appeal was rejected as improperly filed because the representative was a foreign attorney not authorized to practice before USCIS. The AAO noted that even if the appeal had been properly filed, it would have been summarily dismissed for failing to specifically identify any error of law or fact in the original denial.
Criteria Discussed
Employment Abroad In A Managerial Or Executive Capacity Employment In The U.S. In A Managerial Or Executive Capacity Qualifying Relationship Between U.S. And Foreign Entities One Year Of Qualifying Employment Abroad Petitioner Doing Business For At Least One Year Improper Filing Of Appeal By Unauthorized Counsel Failure To Identify Erroneous Conclusion Of Law Or Statement Of Fact
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Research more EB-1C decisions on MeritDraft
Browse AAO decisions by visa type, outcome, and criteria discussed.
Browse Decisions →