dismissed EB-1C

dismissed EB-1C Case: Corporate Management

๐Ÿ“… Date unknown ๐Ÿ‘ค Company ๐Ÿ“‚ Corporate Management

Decision Summary

The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner failed to provide additional evidence or a brief to support the appeal after filing the notice. Despite counsel indicating that supporting documents would be submitted, nothing was received for over fourteen months, thereby failing to identify any specific error of law or fact in the original decision.

Criteria Discussed

Qualifying Managerial Or Executive Capacity Abroad Qualifying Managerial Or Executive Capacity In The U.S. Qualifying Corporate Relationship

Sign up free to download the original PDF

View Full Decision Text
U.S.Departmentof HomelandSecurity
U. S.CitizenshipandImmigrationServices
AdministrativeAppealsOffice (AAO)
20 MassachusettsAve.N.W., MS 2090
Washington,DC 20529-2090
U.S.Citizenship
and Immigration
Services
DATE: DEC 2 0 2012 OFFICE:TEXASSERVICECENTER
IN RE: Petitioner:
Beneficiary:
PETITION: ImmigrantPetitionforAlienWorkerasaMultinationalExecutiveor ManagerPursuantto
Section203(b)(1)(C)of theImmigrationandNationalityAct, 8 U.S.C.ยง 1153(b)(1)(C)
ONBEHALFOFPETITIONER:
INSTRUCTIONS:
Enclosedpleasefind thedecisionof theAdministrativeAppealsOffice in yourcase.All of thedocuments
relatedto this matterhavebeenreturnedto the office that originally decidedyour case. Pleasebe advisedthat
anyfurtherinquirythatyoumighthaveconcerningyourcasemustbemadeto thatoffice.
If you believethe AAO inappropriatelyappliedthe law in reachingits decision,or you have additional
information that you wish to have considered,you may file a motion to reconsideror a motion to reopen in
accordancewith the instructionson FormI-290B,Noticeof Appealor Motion,with a feeof $630. The
specificrequirementsfor filing sucha motioncanbe foundat 8 C.F.R.ยง 103.5.Do not file any motion
directly with theAAO. Pleasebeawarethat8C.F.R.ยง 103.5(a)(1)(i)requiresanymotionto befiled within
30daysof thedecisionthatthemotionseekstoreconsideror reopen.
Thankyou,
RonRosenberg
ActingChief,AdministrativeAppealsOffice
www.uscis.gov
Page2
DISCUSSION:Thepreferencevisapetitionwasdeniedby theDirector,TexasServiceCenter.Thematteris
nowbeforetheAdministrativeAppealsOffice(AAO)onappeal.Theappealwill besummarilydismissed.
ThepetitionerisaGeorgiacorporationthatseekstoemploythebeneficiaryasitspresident.Accordingly,the
petitionerendeavorsto classifythe beneficiaryas an employment-basedimmigrantpursuantto section
203(b)(1)(C)of theImmigrationandNationalityAct (theAct), 8 U.S.C.ยง 1153(b)(1)(C),asa multinational
executiveor manager.
Thedirectordeniedthepetitionbasedonthreegroundsof ineligibility. Namely,thedirectordeterminedthat
thepetitionerfailedtodemonstratethat:1)thebeneficiarywasemployedabroadin aqualifyingmanagerialor
executivecapacity;2) thebeneficiarywouldbeemployedin theUnitedStatesin a qualifyingmanagerialor
executivecapacity:and3)thepetitionerhasaqualifyingrelationshipwiththebeneficiary'semployerabroad.
Thepetitionersubmittedanappealin whichcounsel,onbehalfof thepetitioner,disputedall threegroundsfor
denial. Counselstatedthat a brief and/oradditionalinformationwould be submittedwithin 30 daysin
supportof theappeal,whichwasreceivedby U.S.CitizenshipandImmigrationServiceson September29,
2011. To date,however,morethanfourteenmonthssincetheappealwasreceived,thepetitionerhasnot
supplementedtherecordwithanyfurtherdocumentationregardingthegroundscitedfordenial.Accordingly,
therecordwill beconsideredcompleteascurrentlyconstituted.
Theregulationat 8C.F.R.ยง 103.3(a)(1)(v)states,in pertinentpart:
An officerto whomanappealis takenshallsummarilydismissanyappealwhentheparty
concernedfails to identifyspecificallyanyerroneousconclusionof law or statementof fact
fortheappeal.
In visapetitionproceedings,theburdenof provingeligibility for thebenefitsoughtremainsentirelywith the
petitioner. Section291 of the Act, 8 U.S.C.ยง 1361. Inasmuchas the petitionerhasfailedto identify
specificallyanerroneousconclusionof law or a statementof factin this proceeding,thepetitionerhasnot
sustainedthatburden.Therefore,theappealwill besummarilydismissed.
ORDER: Theappealis summarilydismissed.
Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial

MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.

Avoid This in My Petition →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.