EB-1C Dismissed — Furniture (2022): the motion to reconsider was dismissed because the

Decision Summary

The motion to reconsider was dismissed because the petitioner failed to prove the original decision was based on an incorrect application of law or policy. The AAO found that new evidence submitted was not relevant as it was from a period after the petition's filing date. The decision reaffirmed that the petitioner failed to establish the beneficiary would be employed primarily in a managerial or executive capacity, pointing to evidence of the beneficiary performing non-qualifying operational tasks and insufficient subordinate staff at the time of filing.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF