EB-1C Dismissed — International Trade (2023): the petitioner repeatedly failed to prove that the foreign

Decision Summary

The motion was dismissed because the petitioner repeatedly failed to prove that the foreign employer was 'doing business,' meaning providing goods or services in a regular, systematic, and continuous fashion. The petitioner did not submit sufficient, credible, and properly translated documentary evidence, such as recent invoices or sales agreements, despite multiple requests. The AAO declined to review new evidence on motion, as the petitioner had been put on notice of this deficiency multiple times and failed to correct it.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF