EB-1C Dismissed — Jewelry (2012): the motion to reopen was dismissed because the petitioner

Decision Summary

The motion to reopen was dismissed because the petitioner failed to present new facts that were previously unavailable, as required by regulation. The AAO determined that a previous filing was correctly rejected as an improper second appeal, and further found that the petitioner's claims of ineffective assistance of prior counsel were not sufficiently evidenced.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF