EB-1C Dismissed — Jewelry And Art (2013): the motion to reopen was dismissed because the new evidence

Decision Summary

The motion to reopen was dismissed because the new evidence presented was not available at the time of the original filing, and eligibility must be established at that time. The motion to reconsider was dismissed because the petitioner failed to demonstrate that the previous decisions incorrectly applied the law, with the AAO reaffirming that the beneficiary primarily performs non-qualifying duties due to a lack of subordinate staff.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF