Dismissed
EB-1C
EB-1C Dismissed — Management (2013): it was filed untimely, 35 days after the decision was
Decision Summary
The appeal was rejected because it was filed untimely, 35 days after the decision was issued, exceeding the 33-day limit. The AAO also noted that even if it had been timely, it would have been summarily dismissed because the petitioner failed to specifically identify an erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the original denial.
Criteria Discussed
Timely Filing Of Appeal Motion To Reopen/Reconsider Failure To Identify Erroneous Conclusion Of Law Or Statement Of Fact
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Research more EB-1C decisions on MeritDraft
Browse AAO decisions by visa type, outcome, and criteria discussed.
Browse Decisions →