dismissed EB-1C

dismissed EB-1C Case: Management

📅 Date unknown 👤 Company 📂 Management

Decision Summary

The appeal was rejected as untimely filed. Counsel sent the appeal to the wrong office (the AAO), and it was only received by the correct office (the director) 44 days after the decision was issued, exceeding the 33-day filing deadline. The untimely appeal did not meet the requirements to be treated as a motion to reopen or reconsider.

Criteria Discussed

Timely Filing Of Appeal Motion To Reopen Motion To Reconsider

Sign up free to download the original PDF

View Full Decision Text
identifyingdatadeletedto
peeventclearlyunwarranted
invasionofpersonalprivacy
PUBLICCOPY
U.S.Departmentof HomelandSecurity
U. S.CitizenshipandImmigrationServices
AdministrativeAppealsOffice (AAO)
20 MassachusettsAve.N.W., MS2090
Washington,DC 20529-2090
U.S.Citizenship
and Immigration
Services
DATE: APR 1 2 2012 OFFICE:TEXASSERVICECENTER
IN RE:
PETITION: ImmigrantPetitionfor AlienWorkerasaMultinationalExecutiveorManagerPursuant
to Section203(b)(1)(C)of theImmigrationandNationalityAct, 8U.S.C.§ 1153(b)(1)(C)
ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER:
INSTRUCTIONS:
Enclosedpleasefind the decisionof the AdministrativeAppealsOffice in your case. All of the
documentsrelatedto this matterhavebeenreturnedto theoffice thatoriginally decidedyour case.Please
beadvisedthatanyfurtherinquirythatyoumighthaveconcerningyourcasemustbemadetothatoffice.
Thankyou,
Perry Rhew
Chief,AdministrativeAppealsOffice
www.uscis.gov
Page2
DISCUSSION: TheDirector, TexasServiceCenter,deniedthe immigrantvisapetition. The matteris
now before the Administrative AppealsOffice (AAO) on appeal. The appealwill be rejectedas untimely
filed.
Theregulationat 8C.F.R.§ 103.2(a)(1)provides,in pertinentpart:
General. Every benefit requestor other document submittedto DHS must be
executedandfiled in accordancewith theforminstructions. . . andsuchinstructions
areincorporatedintotheregulationsrequiringitssubmission.
Asit pertainstotheproperfiling of anappeal,theregulationat 8C.F.R.§ 103.3(a)(2)(i)provides:
Filing Appeal.TheaffectedpartymustsubmitanappealonFormI-290B. Exceptas
otherwiseprovidedin this chapter,theaffectedparty mustpaythe feerequiredby
§103.7of thispart.Theaffectedpartymustsubmitthecompleteappealincludingany
supportingbrief asindicatedin theapplicableforminstructionswithin 30daysafter
serviceof thedecision.
If thedecisionwasmailed,theappealmustbefiledwithin 33days.See8C.F.R.§ 103.8(b).Thedateof
filing is not thedateof submission,but thedateof actualreceiptwith therequiredfee. See8C.F.R.§
103.2(a)(7)(i).
The directorissuedthe decisionon September12, 2011. The directorproperlygavenoticeto the
petitionerthatit had33daysto file theappealandlistedtheproperfeefor anappeal.Thenoticefurther
advised:"Your noticeof appealmustbefiled with thisofficeattheaddressat thetopof thispage." The
noticeconcluded:"The appealmaynot be filed directlywith the AdministrativeAppealsOffice. The
appealmustbefiledattheaddressatthetopof thispage."(Boldemphasisin original.)
CounseldatedtheappealOctober11,2011. Despitetheclearinstructionsin thedirector'snoticeandon
the Form I-290B, counselsentthe appealto the AAO. On October17, 2011, the AAO returnedthe
appealasimproperlyfiledwith thewrongoffice. TheappealwasreceivedbythedirectoronOctober26,
2011,44daysafterthedecisionwasissued.Accordingly,theappealwasuntimelyfiled.
NeithertheAct northepertinentregulationsgranttheAAO authorityto extendthe33-daytimelimit for
filing anappeal.Theregulationat 8C.F.R.§ 103.3(a)(2)(v)(B)(2)statesthat,if anuntimelyappealmeets
therequirementsof a motionto reopenora motionto reconsider,theappealmustbetreatedasa motion,
andadecisionmustbemadeonthemeritsof thecase.
A motionto reopenmuststatethenewfactsto beprovedin thereopenedproceedingand,whenfiled,be
supportedby affidavitsor otherdocumentaryevidence.8 C.F.R.§ 103.5(a)(2).A motionto reconsider
muststatethe reasonsfor reconsiderationandbe supportedby any pertinentprecedentdecisionsto
establishthatthedecisionwasbasedon anincorrectapplicationof law or Servicepolicy. A motionto
reconsidera decisiononanapplicationor petitionmust,whenfiled, alsoestablishthatthedecisionwas
incorrectbasedontheevidenceof recordat thetime of theinitial decision.8 C.F.R.§ 103.5(a)(3).A
motionthatdoesnotmeetapplicablerequirementswhenfiledshallbedismissed.8C.F.R.§ 103.5(a)(4).
Page3
Here,theuntimelyappealdid notmeettherequirementsof a motionto reopenor a motionto reconsider
when it was filed. Therefore, there is no requirement to treat the appeal as a motion under 8 C.F.R.
§ 103.3(a)(2)(v)(B)(2).
Astheappealwasuntimelyfiledanddoesnotqualifyasamotion,theappealmustberejected.
ORDER: Theappealisrejected.
Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial

MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.

Avoid This in My Petition →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.