dismissed EB-1C

dismissed EB-1C Case: Management

๐Ÿ“… Date unknown ๐Ÿ‘ค Company ๐Ÿ“‚ Management

Decision Summary

The appeal was summarily dismissed on procedural grounds, not on the merits of the case. The petitioner failed to identify a specific erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the Director's decision, as required by regulation 8 C.F.R. ยง 103.3(a)(l)(v).

Criteria Discussed

Failure To Identify Error On Appeal

Sign up free to download the original PDF

View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
MATTER OF S-A-M-, LLC 
APPEAL OF TEXAS SERVICE CENTER DECISION 
Non-Precedent Decision of the 
Administrative ~ppeals Office 
DATE: JULY 12,2017 
PETITION: FORM I-140, IMMIGRANT PETITION FOR ALIEN WORKER 
The Petitioner, a self-described "management company," seeks to permanently employ the 
Beneficiary as its "CEO/President/General Manager" under the first preference immigrant 
classification for multinational executives or managers. See Immigration and Nationality Act 
section 203(b)(1)(C), 8 U.S.C. ยง 1153(b)(l)(C). This classification allows a U.S. employer to 
permanently transfer a qualified foreign employee to the United States to work in a managerial or 
executive capacity. 
The Director of the Texas Service Center revoked the previously approved petition. The matter is 
now before us on appeal. Upon review, we will summarily dismiss the appeal. 
I 
I \ 
An officer to whom an appeal is taken shall summarily dismiss any appeal when the party concerned 
fails to identify specifically an erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact for the appeal. 
8 C.F.R. ยง 103.3(a)(l)(v). ' 
The Petitioner did not provide a statement in support of the appeal that specifically identifies an 
erroneous conclusion of law or fact in the decision being appealed. On the Form I-290B, Notice of 
Appeal or Motion, the Petitioner stated that no supplemental brief or additional information will be 
submitted. We have not received a supplemental brief or additional information about the basis for 
the appeal from the Petitioner to date. Because the Petitioner has not identified a specific, erroneous 
conclusion of law or statement of fact in the Director's decision below, the appeal must be 
summarily dismissed. 
ORDER: The appeal is summarily dismissed pursuant to 8 C.F.R. ยง 103.3(a)(l)(v). 
Cite as Matter ofS-A-M-, LLC, ID# 452878 (AAO July 12, 2017) 
Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial

MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.

Avoid This in My Petition →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.