dismissed
EB-1C
dismissed EB-1C Case: Management
Decision Summary
The appeal was summarily dismissed on procedural grounds, not on the merits of the case. The petitioner failed to identify a specific erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the Director's decision, as required by regulation 8 C.F.R. ยง 103.3(a)(l)(v).
Criteria Discussed
Failure To Identify Error On Appeal
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services MATTER OF S-A-M-, LLC APPEAL OF TEXAS SERVICE CENTER DECISION Non-Precedent Decision of the Administrative ~ppeals Office DATE: JULY 12,2017 PETITION: FORM I-140, IMMIGRANT PETITION FOR ALIEN WORKER The Petitioner, a self-described "management company," seeks to permanently employ the Beneficiary as its "CEO/President/General Manager" under the first preference immigrant classification for multinational executives or managers. See Immigration and Nationality Act section 203(b)(1)(C), 8 U.S.C. ยง 1153(b)(l)(C). This classification allows a U.S. employer to permanently transfer a qualified foreign employee to the United States to work in a managerial or executive capacity. The Director of the Texas Service Center revoked the previously approved petition. The matter is now before us on appeal. Upon review, we will summarily dismiss the appeal. I I \ An officer to whom an appeal is taken shall summarily dismiss any appeal when the party concerned fails to identify specifically an erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact for the appeal. 8 C.F.R. ยง 103.3(a)(l)(v). ' The Petitioner did not provide a statement in support of the appeal that specifically identifies an erroneous conclusion of law or fact in the decision being appealed. On the Form I-290B, Notice of Appeal or Motion, the Petitioner stated that no supplemental brief or additional information will be submitted. We have not received a supplemental brief or additional information about the basis for the appeal from the Petitioner to date. Because the Petitioner has not identified a specific, erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the Director's decision below, the appeal must be summarily dismissed. ORDER: The appeal is summarily dismissed pursuant to 8 C.F.R. ยง 103.3(a)(l)(v). Cite as Matter ofS-A-M-, LLC, ID# 452878 (AAO July 12, 2017)
Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.
Avoid This in My Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.