dismissed
EB-1C
dismissed EB-1C Case: Manufacturing
Decision Summary
The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner failed to follow procedural requirements. After stating an intent to submit a brief or additional evidence, the petitioner did not provide any further information to identify a specific error of law or fact in the original decision.
Criteria Discussed
Failure To Identify Specific Error Of Law Or Fact
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
MATTER OF H-, INC. APPEAL OF TEXAS SERVICE CENTER DECISION Non-Precedent Decision of the Administrative Appeals Office DATE: JULY 7, 2017 PETITION: FORM I-140, IMMIGRANT PETITION FOR ALIEN WORKER The Petitioner, an adhesive tape manufacturer, seeks to permanently employ the Beneficiary as a vice president of sales and marketing under the first preference immigrant classification for multinational executives or managers. See Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 203(b)(1)(C), 8 U.S.C. ยง 1153(b)(1)(C). This classification allows a U.S. employer to permanently transfer a qualified foreign employee to the United States to work in a managerial or executive capacity. The Director of the Texas Service Center denied the petition. The matter is now before us on appeal. Upon review, we will summarily dismiss the appeal. ยท An officer to whom an appeal is taken shall summarily dismiss any appeal when the p~rty concerned fails to identify specifically an erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact for the appeal. 8 C.F.R. ยง 103.3(a)(1)(v). / The Petitioner did not provide a sufficient statement in support of the appeal that specifically identifies an erroneous conclusion of law or fact in the decision being appealed. On the Form I-290B, Notice of Appeal or Motion, the Petitioner stated that a brief or additional evidence would be submitted within 30 days of the September 23, 2016, tiling date. However, we have not received anything further from the Petitioner to date. Because the Petitioner has not identified a specific, erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the Director's decision below, the appeal must be summarily dismissed. ORDER: The appeal is summarily dismissed pursuant to 8 C.F.R. ยง 103.3(a)(l)(v). Cite as Matter ofH-, Inc., ID# 477830 (AAO July 7, 2017)
Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.
Avoid This in My Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.