EB-1C Dismissed — Manufacturing (2013): did not establish the beneficiary had been or would be

Decision Summary

The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish that the beneficiary had been or would be employed in a qualifying managerial or executive capacity. The AAO refused to consider new evidence submitted for the first time on appeal, as the petitioner had failed to provide this information in response to the director's specific Request for Evidence (RFE).

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF