Dismissed
EB-1C
EB-1C Dismissed — Marketing (2011): the petitioner failed to specifically identify any
Decision Summary
The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner failed to specifically identify any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact from the original denial. The petitioner also failed to submit a promised brief or any additional evidence to support the appeal.
Criteria Discussed
Failure To Identify Erroneous Conclusion Of Law Or Statement Of Fact 8 C.F.R. § 103.3(A)(1)(V)
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Research more EB-1C decisions on MeritDraft
Browse AAO decisions by visa type, outcome, and criteria discussed.
Browse Decisions →