dismissed EB-1C Case: Multinational Management

dew to 
&ati@"urg- warraatsd 
pvent clearly un 
hvmion of persod privsY 
U.S. Department of Homeland Security 
20 Mass. Ave., N.W., Rm. 3000 
Washington, DC 20529 
U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
EAC 05 221 53018 
PETITION: 
 Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker as a Multinational Executive or Manager Pursuant to 
Section 203(b)(l)(C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 4 1153(b)(l)(C) 
ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: 
INSTRUCTIONS : 
This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All documents have been returned to 
the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that office. 
Robe eF= . Wiemann, Chief 
Administrative Appeals Office 
DISCUSSION: The preference visa petition was denied by the Director, Vermont Service Center. The 
matter is now before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) on appeal. The appeal will be rejected as 
improperly filed. 
The regulation at 8 C.F.R. § 103.3(a)(2)(v)(A)(2) states, in part, the following: 
If an appeal is filed by an attorney or representative without a properly executed Notice of 
Entry of Appearance as Attorney or Representative (Form G-28) entitling that person to file 
the appeal, the appeal is considered improperly filed. 
In the present matter, counsel claimed to file an appeal on behalf of the petitioner and submitted a Form G-28, 
Notice of Entry of Appearance as Attorney or Representative. However, the Form G-28 was improperly 
A. a- 7 
executed. 
 sp&.5fically, the Form G-28 ibentified 
 as the person consenting to counsel's 
representation on behalf of the petitioner, the affected party in this proceeding. See 8 C.F.R. 
5 103,3(a)(l)(iii)(~). However, the signature of the person consenting is that of the beneficiary, not Tarnam 
Altari. As the signature of the person consenting on behalf of the petitioner does not match the printed name 
of the person consenting, the Form G-28 cannot be deemed properly executed and, therefore, vests no right in 
the attorney to file an appeal on behalf of the petitioner. 
Accordingly, the AAO sent counsel a facsimile notifying him that a properly executed Form G-28, signed by 
counsel and the consenting affected party, must be submitted to the AAO within five business days. 
However, counsel failed to respond to this request. As such, the AAO concludes that the appeal was 
improperly filed and must be rejected pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 103.3(a)(2)(v)(A)(I), which calls for rejection of 
an improperly filed appeal, where the person filing it is not entitled to do so. 
ORDER: The appeal is rejected.