dismissed EB-1C

dismissed EB-1C Case: Multinational Management

๐Ÿ“… Date unknown ๐Ÿ‘ค Company ๐Ÿ“‚ Multinational Management

Decision Summary

The Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) affirmed the director's decision to deny the petition. The provided text is a summary that outlines the procedural history, where a prior decision was withdrawn and remanded, but the subsequent new denial from the director was ultimately upheld.

Criteria Discussed

Not specified

Sign up free to download the original PDF

View Full Decision Text
(b)(6)
DATE: OFFICE: NEBRASKA SERVICE CENTER 
SEP 2 5 2014 
INRE: Petitioner: 
Beneficiary: 
U.S. Department of Homeland Security 
U. S. Citizenship and Immigration Services 
Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) 
20 Massachusetts Ave. N.W., MS 2090 
Washington, DC 20529-2090 
U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
FILE: 
PETITION: Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker as a Multinational Executive or Manager Pursuant to 
Section 203(b)(l)(C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. ยง 1153(b)(l)(C) 
ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: 
INSTRUCTIONS: 
Enclosed please find the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) in your case. 
This is a non-precedent decision. The AAO does not announce new constructions of law nor establish agency 
policy through non-precedent decisions. If you believe the AAO incorrectly applied current law or policy to 
your case or if you seek to present new facts for consideration, you may file a motion to reconsider or a 
motion to reopen, respectively. Any motion must be filed on a Notice of Appeal or Motion (Form I-290B) 
within 33 days of the date of this decision . Please review the Form I-290B instructions at 
http://www.uscis.gov/forms for the latest information on fee, filing location, and other requirements. 
See also 8 C.F.R. ยง 103.5. Do not file a motion directly with the AAO. 
Ron Rosenberg 
Chief, Administrative Appeals Office 
www.uscis.gov 
(b)(6)
NON-PRECEDENT DECISION 
Page 2 
DISCUSSION: The preference visa petition was denied by the Director, Nebraska Service Center. 
The petitioner appealed the director's decision to the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO). The AAO 
withdrew the director's decision and remanded the matter to the service center for further action and a new 
decision, with instructions to certify the decision to the AAO if the decision is adverse to the petitioner. See 8 
C.F.R. ยง 103.4(a)(l). The director complied with those instructions and issued a new decision, which has 
been certified to the AAO for review. The AAO will affirm the director's decision. 
Accordingly, the AAO shall not disturb the director's denial of the petition. 
ORDER: The director's April30, 2014 decision is affirmed. The petition is denied. 
Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial

MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.

Avoid This in My Petition →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.