EB-1C Dismissed — Plastics Manufacturing (2023): did not establish the beneficiary would be employed in a

Decision Summary

The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish that the beneficiary would be employed in a qualifying executive capacity. The petitioner provided a vague and general job description and, in response to a Request for Evidence, refused to provide specific details about the beneficiary's daily duties, instead arguing that prior L-1A approvals were sufficient. The AAO concluded that the evidence was insufficient to show the beneficiary would primarily perform high-level executive duties rather than the day-to-day operational tasks of the business.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF