EB-1C Dismissed — Real Estate Development (2008): the motion to reopen was dismissed because it failed to

Decision Summary

The motion to reopen was dismissed because it failed to state new facts supported by documentary evidence, as required by regulation. The petitioner had been previously put on notice regarding the inadequacy of the beneficiary's job descriptions and had ample opportunity to address it, so the supplemental description was not considered new evidence. The petitioner's reliance on general descriptions from the Occupational Outlook Handbook was also deemed improper.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF